300 Blackout vs 308 Caliber Comparison: Why Intended Purpose Matters

The 300 AAC Blackout and 308 Winchester are both 30-caliber rifle cartridges that shoot a .308” diameter bullet. However, this is where the similarities end as both cartridges have a different intended purpose.

In this caliber comparison article, we are going to take a detailed look at both the 300 AAC Blackout and the 308 Winchester. Unlike previous articles, I won’t “crown a winner” because the difference between 308 vs 300 Blackout is comparing apples to oranges.

Instead, we will take a deeper look into what the intended purpose of each rifle cartridge is and how having versatility within a caliber is a good thing for you and the 2A community in general.

I don’t know about you, but I’m ready to rack the charging handle on my AR platform and squeeze the trigger on this comparison between 308 vs 300 Blackout. Let’s close distance and ENGAGE!

308 vs 300 Blackout: A Tale of Two 30’s

As we mentioned earlier, the only similarity between the 308 Winchester and the 300 AAC Blackout is that they both shoot the same .308” diameter bullet.

Each rifle cartridge was developed for a specific role and each excels at its intended role.

However, the two rounds could not be more dissimilar, and we will explore the differences below.

300 AAC Blackout: The Dark Ops Wishlist Given Form

The development of the 300 AAC Blackout (designated 300 BLK by SAAMI) rifle cartridge began in 2010 when Robert Silvers of the Advanced Armament Corporation (which was later acquired by Remington) was approached by a member of the US Military “dark ops” community.

The unnamed military customer came to him with a problem that Silvers was eager to solve.

With the widespread adoption of the 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge (civilian ammo designation: 223 Remington or 223 Rem) for the M4 carbine, US troops were having to use the round for both long range and close quarters combat.

Overall, some special forces units were unhappy with the stopping power that the 5.56 NATO and the 9mm (used in several SMGs) offered during close quarters combat and they wanted something that had more “oomph”. Something along the lines of the 7.62x39mm Soviet round fired through the AK-47.

However, there were some other requirements that this customer required as well:

  1. The rounds needed to fit into a standard STANAG AR-pattern magazine and maintain a 30-round ammo capacity
  2. The cartridge face must be the same as 5.56 NATO so a bolt change was not needed
  3. It had to shoot 30 caliber bullets and mimic the ballistic performance of the 7.62x39mm Soviet round
  4. The new rifle cartridge needed to be compatible with short barreled rifles (SBR, barrels under 16”) and be completely functional with a suppressor/silencer
  5. Both supersonic and subsonic varieties of ammo needed to be functional for long range shots as well as close quarters battle, respectively

However, Silvers was not dismayed, and he returned to AAC to begin work on a new cartridge that would meet all these needs. The search for a host cartridge had begun.

Attempts to integrate new calibers into the AR platform were nothing new to the shooting community. The adaptation of the 6.8 Remington Special Purpose Cartridge (SPC) and 6.5 Grendel into the AR platform were mildly successful; however, they fell short of the mark in several key areas.

The 6.8 SPC and the 6.5 Grendel have a larger case head than the 5.56 NATO cartridge, so a new bolt was required for the host carbine.

Secondly, although both cartridges could be loaded into a standard capacity AR-15 magazine, they could not be loaded to 30 rounds because of the increased case size.

Colt Firearms and other manufacturers had been unsuccessful in adapting a 30-caliber cartridge to the M4 carbine. Complicating matters, the M4 cannot be easily modified to simply shoot 7.62x39 Soviet either as the severe case angle causes multiple chambering issues using a standard M4 magazine.

As Silvers continued his hunt to find a proper host cartridge for his new round, he started looking at different wildcat cartridges in the shooting community.

The 300 Whisper was probably the best wildcat cartridge that Silvers encountered, and it eventually became the host for the 300 BLK. That being said, the 300 Whisper could not simply be adapted to be fired from an AR platform because it did not have standardized loadings with SAAMI (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute).

As AAC/Remington was a SAAMI company, it could not load 300 Whisper ammo. Therefore, Silvers took the concepts from the 300 Whisper and modified them to meet their design specifications.

The new round was called the 300 AAC Blackout (300 BLK) and was approved by SAAMI on January 17, 2011.

300 BLK Ammo Specs

Since its approval by SAAMI in 2011, the 300 BLK has exceeded expectations in almost every category.

With an overall case length of 35mm, the 300 BLK has a case capacity of approximately 19.2 grains. The reduced case length was required to allow it to fit into a standard M4 carbine magazine while being loaded with a longer 30 caliber bullet.

300 BLK ammo can be broken down into two different bullet weights, 220 grain subsonic and 110 to 125 grain supersonic.

Supersonic ammo, typically firing a 125 grain bullet, will have a muzzle velocity of approximately 2250 fps and have a muzzle energy of around 1404 ft-lbs. Industry standards list the effective range of the supersonic 125 grain bullet loadings to be 500 yards.

In contrast, subsonic ammo will fire a 220 grain bullet and have a muzzle velocity of around 1000 fps and a muzzle energy of 488 ft-lbs with an effective range of 200 yards.

These two popular loadings really illustrate the versatility of 300 BLK ammo. With a simple magazine change, a shooter can switch from supersonic ammunition and long-range engagements to subsonic ammunition for short range combat.

Furthermore, the 300 BLK was designed specifically to experience a full powder burn when being fired in a 9” short barreled rifle (SBR), preferably with a suppressor/silencer.

308 Winchester: The Tried-and-True Warhorse

The 308 Winchester (7.62x51mm NATO designation) has been in service with the US Military for over 60 years and is the quintessential hunting round for whitetail deer to black bear.

The development of the 308 Winchester began from the needs of the US Military to advance into a new realm of battle rifles similar to the STG-44 and the AK-47.

In 1952, the U.S. Military started developing a replacement for the long-serving 30-06 Springfield cartridge (military designation: M2 Ball or 7.62x63mm).

Although the 30-06 Springfield had honorably served through both World Wars and Korea, the US Military wanted to develop a new cartridge that was lighter and more suitable for fully automatic rifle fire.

With advancements in rifle powder technology and case design in the 1950s, the new 7.62x51mm NATO rifle round was able to achieve nearly identical ballistic performance as the 30-06 Springfield with a shorter cartridge case length and lower overall weight.

The US Army officially adopted the 7.62x51mm NATO round in 1958 and it has been in service ever since.

Although the 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge and its parent rifle, the M14, only saw limited frontline use in Vietnam before being replaced by the 5.56 NATO, the military was quick to adapt it to use in sniper operations and in fully automatic machine gun use.

With a massive effective range out to and beyond 800 yards, it didn’t take long for civilian firearms manufacturers to take notice of the new military round.

Winchester was the first to adapt the new cartridge to its Model 70 bolt action rifle, renaming the cartridge the 308 Winchester.

The 308 Winchester quickly rose to be THE long-range high velocity hunting round that had enough muzzle energy to stop a black bear in its tracks.

Since its acceptance by the hunting and competitive shooting communities, the 308 Winchester has been a staple at deer camps and F Class Shooting Competitions alike.

308 Winchester Ammo Specs

308 Winchester ammo is available in a delirium-inducing amount of bullet weights. From 55 grain all the way up to 220 grain weight bullets, you will never lack variety when it comes to selecting the best 308 round for your purpose.

With a 51 mm overall case length, the 308 Winchester offers a whopping 52 grain case capacity. This translates to a 150 grain bullet loading have a shoulder-bruising 2820 fps muzzle velocity and a muzzle energy of 2648 ft-lbs.

300 Blackout vs 308 Winchester: The Comparison

Although these calibers are two completely different rounds with differing modes of service, I wanted to give you a quick rundown of each rifle cartridge to explain the pros and cons.


In this category, there is simply no contest. The 300 BLK wins by an absolute landslide having approximately 4x less recoil when compared to the 308 Winchester.

Now I know what you’re thinking, because I’ve thought it too… “Recoil shouldn’t matter, just tough it out and focus on the shooting fundamentals!”

And I’ll say that on paper, you’re probably right. However, this rarely happens in the field.

Shoulder fatigue is a real problem when firing for long periods or trying to line up follow-up shots. Once this happens, a shooter will start encountering recoil anticipation, trigger jerk and over-correction; causing their down range accuracy to suffer.

When it comes to recoil, the 300 Blackout is clearly the better option.


We’ve produced some absolutely sick ballistics tables for you a little further down in this article, but I wanted to share a few highlights for you here.

When it comes to ballistics coefficient, the 308 Winchester is the clear winner when comparing to the 300 Blackout supersonic ammunition. With an average BC of around 0.45, the 308 Winchester is clearly the winner as 300 BLK ballistic coefficients typically below 0.4.

In terms of bullet drop and velocity (fps), the 308 is clearly the winner here as well. But this shouldn’t surprise you too much as the 308 was specifically designed to be effective at longer-range.

Home Defense

Both the 308 Win and the 300 BLK will serve you well in any self-defense situation. However, there is one critical thing to consider when discussing close range engagements.

And that critical issue is: Overpenetration

The 300 BLK was specifically designed to be shot in a SBR with a suppressor, which makes the 300 Blackout the better choice for indoor, short range engagements.

Furthermore, the 200 to 220 grain subsonic ammo is a partial safeguard against overpenetration as it will begin to lose velocity rapidly when it enters a target.

Compare this with the 308 Winchester freight train that might end up blasting through 2-3 suburban houses (and potential innocent bystanders) before even blinking an eye.

Remember, “Every bullet you fire has a lawyer attached to it” as my first shooting instructor was fond of saying. Therefore, we must carefully consider overpenetration when shooting in close quarters for self-defense.

This makes the 300 BLK the ideal home defense choice with its low recoil (faster follow-up shots), AR platform integration (modularity and light weight), short barrel compatibility, ease of sound suppression, and 30-round magazine capacity.

Suppressor Integration

Again, the 300 BLK is the clear winner here as it was specifically designed to be used with a suppressor.

One of the coolest things I’ve ever seen/heard is a subsonic 300 BLK being fired suppressed. It’s literally “movie gun” quiet.

You know what I’m talking about right?

When James Bond whips out his suppressed AR-15 or KRISS Vector and starts blasting away in full auto and all you hear is the sound of the wind…

Yeah, it doesn’t work like that in real life.

There are two things which make a bullet loud: the explosion of the powder and the “sonic crack” of the bullet breaking the sound barrier.

A silencer can greatly reduce the sound of the powder explosion, but if the bullet is supersonic, there will still be a “crack” of the bullet breaking the sound barrier.


If you’re shooting subsonic ammunition, there is no “crack” because your bullet never broke the sound barrier.

With this in mind, you can effectively shoot hearing safe with a 300 BLK, a suppressor, and subsonic rounds.

Long-Range Shooting and Accuracy

Again, there is no comparison in this category as the 308 Winchester clearly dominates.

With its massive case capacity, high velocity, lower bullet drop, higher ballistic coefficient, and massive effective range, the 308 dominates the long-range shooting scene when compared to the 300 BLK.

However, this should not come as a surprise and the 308 Winchester is specifically designed for long-range shooting.

300 Blackout vs 308 for Hunting

I wanted to discuss hunting applications as a separate topic as this is one area where there is some controversy in the shooting community.


Yeah, I know we talked about this already, but it bears repeating here as it is a factor to consider.

With 4x less recoil, the 300 AAC Blackout is going to be a lot more forgiving when it comes to making follow-up shots and this can be the difference between ethically harvesting an animal and having a wounded animal escape.

Rifle Availability

In this category, the 308 is the clear winner as it has been around for over 60 years and has seen wide-spread hunting success.

Almost every rifle manufacturer will have an offering in 308 Winchester. In comparison, 300 BLK is a relatively new kid on the playground and there are fewer offerings.

However, many manufacturers are warming up to the 300 Blackout and more rifles are being offered. You can even get a Ruger Mini-14 in 300 BLK now!

Still, there are going to be hundreds of bolt action and semi-automatic options for 308 Winchester hunting rifles, so 308 gets the nod here.

Ammo Varieties

308 Winchester takes this one as well. From the Barnes Varmint Grenade to the Hornady InterLock to a Nosler Partition, there are literally about as many varieties of 308 Winchester ammo as 223 Remington.

As 300 Blackout has only been around for about 10 years, there are fewer varieties of ammo available on the broader market for hunting.

Effective Range

This one can be a little deceptive as it is easy to just say, 308 wins it because it can shoot out past 800 yards. But when you consider that, you need to ask yourself a question:

Can you ethically take an animal at 800 yards?

I’m going to wager that a most responsible hunters will not be comfortable taking a shot at a game animal at that range.

With that in mind, I think it is safe to say that this one is a wash between the two rifle cartridges as most ethical hunting shots will be taken under 400 yards.

Stopping Power

This is a category where the 308 Winchester really shines. With a whopping 2648 ft-lbs of muzzle energy, the 308 Winchester clearly has more stopping power than a 300 BLK.

Does that mean that a 300 Blackout is ineffective as a hunting round? Not at all!

However, I would say that it would not be ethical to hunt anything larger than a whitetail deer with a 300 BLK as penetration and energy drop off significantly out past 400 yards.

A Note on 300 AAC Blackout Subsonic Ammo and Hunting

Reports from the field have shown less than stellar penetration data from the use of subsonic ammunition on medium size game animals, such as feral hogs and whitetail deer.

It is the recommendation of this writer that only supersonic ammo be used for hunting with 300 BLK on medium sized game animals.

Subsonic rounds should be sufficient to take down small varmints such as coyotes, groundhogs, etc.

Continue reading 300 Blackout vs 308 Caliber Comparison: Why Intended Purpose Matters at Ammo.com.


This is essentially a romance novel :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:


Just don’t get the 300 BO. It never got a first date with me. I saw a video years ago where it wouldn’t even penetrate a windshield at some relatively normal distance. So if (a very Big If), If I wanted a neutered 308 I wouldn’t take all of the ‘fleshy bits’ and turn it into a ‘inny’. Maybe go with a TAC 30 or a Herret 30. That’s me and my preferences. Somebody’s buying 'em.


I’ll play devils advocate. BTW, that was a decent write-up. Not everyone needs a 300BLK for sure. Mine would have been quite welcome 3 years ago, and right at home playing it’s part when the cop killer was running around in the back 40. But I didn’t have it. I also in retrospect would never have gotten any use out of it, except a better feeling of security.

It all depends on the intended use, no chambering is perfect and no firearm is perfect either, they’re all trade offs. Look at the ballistics table and 300BLK sux bigtime. But shorten the barrel to M4 or even shorter length and now it begins to make sense. My HD round pushes a 85 grain Maker to 2300 fps for approx 7" of penetration in gel and 1k ft/lbs out of a 10.3" handgun barrel. Oh, and no huge fireball. Even with a can to contain the blast it’s still a very short firearm.

Why did I develop the load? Limiting overpenetration should I ever need that. A 12 ga wouldn’t have that quality, neither would any other cartridge I use. But the load I mentioned does.

I can no longer hunt, but I would be perfectly comfortable hunting deer with a 125 grain bullet or even a very quiet subsonic bullet within range and choosing and placing my shot. Yes, I have no problem making precise shot placement I just can’t hunt any longer. The handgun is certainly accurate enough out to at least 50 yards with those Maker 85s. I expect it to be with other loads as well. It’s just a dream to load for and just sips powder.

There’s a reason it’s the 2nd most popular chambering in the AR.

Here’s a link to what I wrote about my 300BLK load not long ago.


Brian, I will give you that it was extensive. Nothing new on the 308 and it just reinforced that the 300 BO doesn’t have a single trait I want.

Horrible ballistics, anemic so very limited hunting range and lousy barrier penetration.

It has to have something, they sure seem to sell 'em. Just not to me or mine.

If a pump 12 ga is to much for self defense (Sippy Cup Joe’s fav BTW) they can get a adapter for their Mossy and run minis.

These folks sell them both. We need to get some for our collapsable, folding stock Maverick 88 12ga. They should take our capacity to 13 or 14+1.


I’m certain you missed this

200gr stopping power in an AR mag/bolt/platform/short barrel /sub sonic capability


Its all there :heart_eyes:


Ah yes there is that.

I know now that some want that. :laughing:

But for what we do it is limited. Though I admit it would have some application for Bear. I will think about putting it on the list.

I guess at heart I am just a stick in the mud.
Instinctively pushing back against whatever feels like a sales job, or propaganda. The libertarian in me holding out against the winds of change…

Lol Interestingly enough the lyrics of this Cold War Anthem are thought by some to have been written by the CIA as Cold War propaganda… :wink:

Edit: Scuse me for the minor derail. Sort of evolved as I went.


The 300BO is great suppressed. Almost movie quiet. For close range CQB it rocks.


Nope, your title realy needed to be Casey Kasem :nerd_face:


It is way too much like the vaccine. Shills saying get this and not that, and they are paid to say it. I already have .45 auto at that bullet weight and speed.


lol, I suppose they could go back to trench sweepers

but… nah, 300bo does what its designed to do


It was designed for CQB. All we had to do was undo the mistakes (9mm). Although I frequent another AR site not for the 300, and it is useful with the hog problem in Texas. Other choices are better because of range, but porky goes down.


The 300bo fits in my arsenal well, I like it!


Yep, I get that suppressor thing. Certainly got it from the write up too. Being honest, 30 caliber 200 gr bullets ain’t no joke either…

If suppressors were ‘legal’ here in the USA in the manner that they are in some countries, that feature would be a important feature for us. We just don’t want the hassle. We travel so much for work we’re hardly ever home. We already have enough problems traveling with the firearms as it is. We have even stopped flying due to TSA harassment. Now we don’t work in, or even go to many states because of their firearm laws.

Add to that we rarely engage in CQB (Thank God) lol. Though admittedly there have been a few times over the years that presentation has saved the day. If we ever do have to engage in it, we have several ‘Master Blasters’ (6.8 SPC ll) and 12 ga.

For some folks I’ll grant it maybe just the ticket. But its powder volume is really limiting for what we can do with it. The 223/5.56 case is plentiful so reloading and repurposing it seems logical, and I get it.

Personally I think I have come a long, long way. From a wood and steel BA/lever, 30 cal or bigger kind of guy; to a plastic/aluminum mini-action wielding ‘longhair’.

Because of it’s powder volume, stout bolts, no magazine flaws, coupled with new modern projectiles; the versatility of the 6.8 SPC ll case has actually made big MSR fans out of us.


Many years ago, decades ago, before I owned any firearms I would pore over magazines and ballistics charts to find the “best” cartridge. Surely there had to one that was the best. Then I think it was Jack O’Connor who said put the properly constructed bullet in the right place and the animal is going down. I thought about it and realized the wisdom in that statement. My foolish search for the best cartridge stopped then. Now I look at what I want to do and find the best cartridge for that firearm to do a certain job. I’m also not above making my own ammo and tailoring it to what I want to do. Generally I can make exactly what I want if I’ve chosen the right cartridge.

There are 2 extreme schools of thought when it comes to ballistics, slow and heavy and fast and light, and everything in between. They all work as long as the bullet is constructed properly and hits in the right place. Sometimes lots of tradeoffs need to be made along the way.


Pretty much right on there Brian. Ain’t it great!

This is definitely an American Dilemma. LoL

May God Preserve the USA forever! :pirate_flag::hitman:


I’m considering a new 9-10.5" pistol/SBR upper build, and I’m weighing between 300 BLK and 7.62x39. I’m waiting for my suppressor’s paperwork to finish. My envisioned primary use is suppressed home defense, secondary use as an unsuppressed folding backpack gun.

I like 300 BLK because it is designed for suppression, is easier to make mags work, has 5 rounds more standard capacity, and won’t require changing out the bolt, firing pin, or hammer spring. But 7.62x39 is very cheap, and also loses very little velocity when the barrel is shortened. It might suppress just as nicely when given subsonic ammo, but I don’t know.

Is 300 BLK more accurate? Does it suppress significantly better? Is the recoil more pleasant?


With a good can the BO is movie quiet. 7.62x39 doesn’t feed as well in an AR platform.


No reason to hold back, build both, I’d go with the 300BO as the quality purpose built build and do the ak variant to sling lead cheaper, a toy


A regular 123 grain out of a 10.5 inch barrel in 7.62 x 39 is also a tad bit of a flame thrower and loud. It shoots nice but for home defense I don’t know if it would be my first choice .