357 SIG vs 9mm: The Answer to a Question That Was Never Asked

For several reasons, the 357 SIG vs 9mm debate is not often thought of, even though the 357 SIG has some of the most devout supporters in the shooting community.

Designed to replicate the ballistics of the venerable 357 Magnum, the 357 SIG has a small following inside the law enforcement community and government agencies such as the United States Secret Service (USSS) and the Texas Department of Public Safety (TDPS, a.k.a. the Texas Rangers).

The key word here is “small."

Proponents of the 357 SIG will point to its higher muzzle velocity, muzzle energy, and stopping power as the primary reasons for selecting the 357 SIG as your self-defense ammo.

But is the 357 SIG truly a “man stopper” as many of its loyal fanbase claim, or is this simply confirmation bias due to the belief that shooters can carry a 357 Mag in a semi-auto handgun?

On the other hand, does less recoil, higher magazine capacity, and the ability to land quicker follow-up shots make the 9mm the ideal defense round? Or is the 9mm just an oversized mouse cartridge?

In this article, we will take an objective look at the 357 SIG cartridge and how it compares to the long-serving 9mm Luger.

I hope you like muzzle blast because we’re starting with the new kid on the block, the 357 SIG.

.357 SIG: A 357 Magnum in a Semi-Auto Package

Development of the 357 SIG round began in 1994 (that’s 4 years AFTER the release of the 40 S&W). Sig Sauer, in conjunction with ammo manufacturer, Federal Cartridge, sought to replicate the terminal ballistics of the 357 Magnum in a more compact, semi-auto package.

The 357 Mag was developed by the Master of the Magnum, Elmer Keith, in conjunction with Smith and Wesson and Winchester. The iconic American round was designed to fire a 0.357” diameter bullet at 1450 fps out of a 4 inch barrel.

The 357 Magnum is an excellent law enforcement, personal defense, and hunting round and saw widespread success in the revolver market. The 125-grain hollow point bullets are well known for their lethality and stopping power and were the go-to ammo for police officers until semi-auto pistol designs (like the 1911 and 45 ACP) became more popular.

The performance Sig Sauer was attempting to replicate in the 357 SIG was the 357 Magnum itself; the firing of a 125-grain bullet at 1400+ fps out of a 4 inch barrel.

To accomplish this, Sig Sauer took a page out of the Smith and Wesson playbook and experimented with the 10mm Auto cartridge (another win for Lt Col Jeff Cooper). The finalized design used the 10mm Auto as the parent case that was necked down to accept 0.355” (9mm) diameter bullets.

VoilĂ , the 357 SIG was born!

The 357 SIG pushes 125-grain bullets at a muzzle velocity topping out at 1450 fps, effectively duplicating the 357 Magnum round fired from a 4-inch barrel. SAAMI specs indicate that the maximum allowable pressure for the 357 SIG at 40,000 psi.

One aspect of the 357 SIG that separates it from other pistol cartridges is that it utilizes a bottle-neck-shaped cartridge similar to rifle cartridges. This allows for very reliable feeding and the increased powder capacity that is needed to achieve the terminal performance similar to that of the 357 Mag.

Once approved for sale in the US, Sig Sauer released the Sig P229 handgun which was chambered in their new 357 SIG ammo and specifically designed to handle the high pressures of the new pistol cartridge.

In 1998, the Texas Department of Public Safety (TDPS, Texas Rangers) was the first government agency to adopt the 357 SIG as their duty ammo. Other notable government and law enforcement agencies who have opted to switch to the 357 SIG and the Sig P229 were the Federal Air Marshals and the Secret Service.

The 357 SIG saw mild success in law enforcement circles and those agencies which adopted the new Sig cartridge reported favorable terminal performance in officer-involved confrontations.

And although the 357 SIG has a small and steadfast core of followers, it never achieved the popularity level of the 40 S&W, 9mm Luger, and 45 ACP.

To complicate things, many law enforcement agencies including the FBI and Texas DPS are moving away from the 357 SIG and 40 S&W back to the 9mm as their standard issue ammo of choice.

Why is that, exactly? Let’s examine the 9mm Luger cartridge and find out!

What is 9mm? The Most Popular Handgun Cartridge in the World

The 9x19mm Luger was designed by the Austrian gunsmith Georg Luger in 1901. Luger derived the 9mm Parabellum from his previous design, the 7.65x21mm Parabellum.

In 1903 he presented the 9mm Luger to the US military for consideration at the Springfield Arsenal and was in competition with Browning and the 45 ACP. The 9mm was not adopted by the US military until much later and was instead picked up by the German Imperial Navy and Army in 1904 and 1908, respectively.

The 9x19mm Luger is also referred to as the 9x19mm NATO, 9mm Parabellum, or simply the 9mm. SAAMI specs list the maximum pressure for 9mm at 35,000 psi and standard 115 grain FMJ ammo will have an average muzzle velocity of 1180 fps and muzzle energy of 355 foot-pounds.

After World War I and through World War II, the 9mm Luger cartridge and its accompanying Luger P-08 handgun became one of the most popular handgun cartridges in Europe for both military and law enforcement. However, the United States was late to the party as it clung to the idiom, “Bigger Bullets are Better” and our beloved 45 ACP until the 1980s with the adoption of the Beretta M9 Service Pistol by the US Army.

The popularity of the 9mm Luger really exploded in the United States during the 80s and 90s with the introduction of extremely reliable semi-auto pistols, such as the Glock 17, the Sig Sauer P226, and more recently the Springfield XD and the Smith and Wesson M&P.

Fervor for the 9mm has only been bolstered by the U.S. military’s adoption of the Sig Sauer P320 as the new standard-issue sidearm for military personnel.

The 9mm has become synonymous with law enforcement and home defense for its high magazine capacity, stopping power using jacketed hollow point ammo (JHP), and low overall cost per round.

9mm pistols are extremely easy to come by and are relatively inexpensive as all major firearms manufacturers carry some offering for the 9mm cartridge: Glock, Smith and Wesson, Sig Sauer, Kimber, Springfield, Remington, Ruger, and Taurus, just to name a few!

It has truly become the everyday carry (EDC) handgun of choice if you don’t want to carry something more sizable and snappier like a 357 Magnum. And with advancements in hollow point technology, the 9mm has solidified itself as the self-defense ammo of choice for the military, law enforcement, and the civilian concealed carry permit holder.

But is the 9mm Parabellum better than the 357 SIG? Let’s compare these two handgun cartridges and find out.

9mm vs .357 SIG: What’s the Difference?

Both the 9mm Luger and the 357 SIG are extremely capable self-defense handgun cartridges that will undoubtedly defend your life should the need arise.

But is one cartridge superior?

Many lovers of the 357 SIG will point to the supposedly superior ballistics and muzzle energy of the 357 SIG, claiming that it is the modern incarnation of the 357 Magnum in semi-auto form.

These same proponents will quote anecdotal stories about the 357 Mag and how effective a man-stopper it was, and that their beloved 357 SIG is nothing short of the Second Coming of Elmer Keith himself.

And don’t get me wrong, the 357 SIG is a formidable cartridge capable of excellent terminal ballistics and penetration, but does that make it better than a 9mm?

9mm Luger aficionados will tout their massive magazine capacity, ease of quick follow up shots thanks to what they will say is “less recoil than a .22 LR!” (a bit of an exaggeration), relative low cost of ammo, and improved ballistics due to advancements in jacketed hollow point (JHP) technology.

Before we come to fisticuffs over which handgun cartridge is ideal for winning a gunfight, let’s take an objective look at the advantages and disadvantages of each caliber so you can make a more informed purchase on your next CCW pistol.

.357 SIG vs 9mm: Stopping Power

“Stopping Power” is the #1 argument that shooters use to justify choosing the 357 SIG over any other caliber, so we are going to take a deep dive into this concept as it can easily be misunderstood.

So, what exactly is Stopping Power?

Stopping Power is one of those ambiguous terms that gets thrown around a lot at gun stores, campfires, and Internet firearms boards. It’s a concept that certain cartridges are more effective at stopping a bad guy and is often used as justification for picking one caliber over another.

The conversation usually goes something like this…

Noob Gun Owner: “Is a 357 SIG more powerful than a 9mm? Is 357 SIG better for self-defense than 9mm?”

Internet Mall Ninja Firearms Expert: “Oh yes, the 357 SIG has more stopping power than a 9mm! I always EDC my Glock 31 with no less than 5 extra mags full of Underwood JHP ammo!”

I’m hoping that you can tell I’m joking here, but the truth of the matter is that “stopping power” is nothing more than a myth.

Now before you get up in arms and fill my inbox with ballistics tables (don’t worry we will get to those soon enough) and police officer-involved shooting reports, let me explain what I’m talking about.

There are two ways that you will stop a bad guy in a gunfight:

  1. You will lacerate or poke holes in major internal organs, causing either exsanguination (critical blood loss) or incapacitation by hitting the Central Nervous System (CNS).
  2. The bad guy gives up and decides he cannot take any more punishment and either surrenders or retreats

For my astute readers, you’ll have already concluded that all instances of #1 are based on shot placement. Reliably hitting those internal organs or CNS is going to stop the fight a lot quicker than hitting the extremities (arms, legs, etc.)

For #2, anyone who touts “stopping power” as a justification for one cartridge over another will suggest that just being hit by said caliber will be enough to demoralize a bad guy and make him give up.

And this simply is not true.

The truth is that #2 is dependent upon the mental state of the bad guy and has little to do with the caliber that they are shot with. A bad guy high on PCP and feeling like the next incarnation of The Rock will be able to take multiple hits and stay in the fight (there are multiple police reports to attest to this).

In contrast, for criminals like car-jackers or burglars, often any show of force is enough to make them retreat or surrender. So, in this case, a .22 LR would have the same stopping power as a 45 ACP, 10mm Auto, or 50 AE!

This means that Stopping Power can only truly be quantified by #1, which was damage to internal organs and the CNS. So, this means we should all just carry 9mm because many shooters report better accuracy with that cartridge, right?

Well…Yes and no.

Hold onto your tea Alice, we aren’t at the bottom of this rabbit hole yet…

Why is it then, that many proponents and actual end-users of the 357 SIG consistently report favorable results of the SIG round in the field? Is there something we aren’t considering?

There’s no denying that the 357 SIG has superior numbers on paper in terms of higher velocity and muzzle energy. Your standard 125-grain bullet fired from a 357 SIG will have a muzzle velocity of 1350 fps and exert 510 foot-pounds of energy while a 124-grain bullet fired from a 9mm will clock in at 1150 fps and 364 foot-pounds of energy.

Those numbers clearly favor the 357 SIG and one would suspect that the terminal ballistic data would be superior for the 357 SIG compared to the 9mm Luger (however 9mm +p ammo closes the gap somewhat). However, the real-world test results show something else entirely.

FBI ballistic gel testing results for the 357 SIG and the 9mm show that both defense rounds have excellent penetration between 13” and 18”, that’s right in the sweet spot that the FBI qualifies as good. Furthermore, as both cartridges fire the same diameter bullet (0.355”), expansion was essentially identical.

One thing that is not identical between the 357 SIG and the 9mm is the temporary wound cavity caused when the bullet impacts soft tissue. Sometimes referred to as a stretch cavity, the temporary wound cavity is caused by the rapid transfer of energy to the target from the bullet impact.

As you can see in the FBI ballistic gel data pictured here, the 357 SIG shows a larger temporary wound cavity and tissue disruption when compared to the 9mm. This will increase blood loss which can aid in incapacitating the target.

This data would suggest that the 357 SIG can cause more damage to a bad guy due to the increased foot-pounds of energy it can transfer to the target while having the same permanent wound cavity as a 9mm (as they fire the same diameter bullet).

Although stopping power is not something that is quantifiable, there are several other factors that we need to consider like recoil.

.357 SIG vs 9mm: Recoil

In terms of recoil, there is simply no comparison, the 9mm has less recoil for all loadings (even the screaming hot +p+ Underwood offerings).

As the 357 SIG is simply a necked-down 10mm Auto case, it is naturally a high-pressure round. SAAMI specs allot for an additional 5,000 psi of pressure for the 357 SIG compared to the 9mm…that’s quite a lot.

The higher velocity that the 357 SIG offers comes at a price and that price is felt recoil as well as wear and tear on the handgun, especially the polymer-framed variety like Glock.

Anyone who has had the “pleasure” of firing off a few magazines of 357 SIG will tell you that it has a stout and snappy recoil, somewhat like the 40 S&W.

Added recoil means slower follow-up shots, as shooters must fight the recoil to get the sights back on target more for the 357 SIG than the 9mm. It also means that the 357 SIG requires more training to shoot accurately as shooters with smaller hands or smaller frames will have a harder time controlling the firearm during the recoil impulse.

The muzzle blast from the 357 SIG can also be an issue for an inexperienced shooter as it will slow sight re-acquisition in low-light shooting situations.

Furthermore, all that added pressure created by the 357 SIG will cause a firearm to wear out faster. And although most of us will never shoot a semi-auto handgun enough to wear it out entirely, recoil springs and other small parts will need to be replaced more frequently with a 357 SIG handgun than compared to a 9mm.

In terms of recoil and controllability, the 9mm Luger is clearly the superior choice.

9mm vs 357 SIG: Magazine Capacity

Magazine capacity favors the 9mm Luger. As the 357 SIG is just a necked down 10mm Auto, it has a similar magazine capacity as a 40 S&W.

Standard Glock 17 magazines can hold 17 rounds of 9mm Luger plus one in the chamber. On the other hand, full-sized Glock 31 magazines can hold 15 rounds of 357 SIG.

This difference is not massive, it’s only 2 rounds! However, if you EDC your pistol and 1 extra magazine, that translates into 4 rounds difference. And that could make a difference in a gunfight.

There’s no denying that the 9mm Luger will be able to bring more ammo to the fight for the same carry weight.

.357 SIG vs 9mm: Cost and Availability

I feel a bit like a broken record here because this category also favors the 9mm.

There are dozens of different handgun offerings for 9mm as every major firearms manufacturer has at least one pistol chambered in 9mm Luger.

Take your pick from Springfield, Remington, Glock, Sig Sauer, Ruger, Taurus, Smith and Wesson, and Kimber, just to name a few.

Furthermore, ammo for 9mm is plentiful and relatively inexpensive compared to other centerfire pistol ammo.

Standard 9mm FMJ practice ammo, such as Speer Lawman or Winchester white box, can easily be had for under $0.50/round for brass-cased ammo and less if you want to shoot steel-cased ammo.

If you’re looking for a good 9mm jacketed hollow point (JHP) defense round, then you should look to pay about $1/round at the time of writing.

The same cannot be said for 357 SIG, and this is directly due to its lack of popularity.

In general, 357 SIG ammo, an even cheaper full metal jacket (FMJ) practice ammo, is going to be approximately double the price of 9mm. 357 SIG will also be about 50% more expensive than 40 S&W.

This assumes that you can even find 357 SIG ammo available for sale as many retailers don’t have any on the shelf at this time.

As the 357 SIG never gained widespread popularity like the 40 S&W, fewer firearms manufacturers picked up the caliber to offer in their handgun lines. At the time of writing, Sig Sauer and Glock are the only handgun manufacturers who have factory handgun offerings in 357 SIG.

Factory new Glock prices are fairly standardized across models, so you should not expect to pay any more for a Glock 31 (in 357 SIG) than you would for a new Glock 17 or 22 (in 9mm and 40 S&W respectively).

Although 357 SIG firearms are limited and ammo is harder to come by, there is a solution to this problem that many shooters might have overlooked.

.357 SIG vs 9mm: Cross Compatibility

As the 357 SIG is simply a necked-down 10mm Auto, it has many things in common with the 40 S&W (which is simply a cut-down 10mm).

Conversion barrels are available for multiple firearms if you love 357 SIG but your preferred manufacturer does not have an offering. A 40 S&W to 357 SIG conversion barrel, like those found at Lone Wolf Distributors, is an easy way to turn your Glock 22 into a Glock 31, effectively giving you two handguns in one.

357 SIG to 9mm conversion barrels are also available so that you can practice with your Sig P229 or Glock 31 and not have to make it endure the added wear and tear that the 357 SIG imparts upon the firearm (not to mention your wrists).

Please note that a replacement recoil spring may be needed to ensure reliability with these conversions, please see the manufacturer’s recommendations to determine if this is required.

However, you are not limited to only Sig Sauer and Glock for these conversions.

Any firearm that fires 40 S&W can be converted to 357 SIG with the proper barrel as the magazine feed lips will be the same for .40 and the .357 SIG load, making magazines interchangeable.

This adds a new level of versatility to any firearm chambered in 40 S&W that you might not have considered.

9mm vs 357 SIG: Reloading

The 9mm Luger is perhaps one of the easiest pistol cartridges to reload. As the 9mm is a straight-walled pistol cartridge, carbide reloading dies can be used and components are plentiful and easy to come by.

You can customize your 9mm loads to your liking as the round offers a wide variety of possibilities, including subsonic 147 grain bullet weight options to super-fast and cheap 115 grain bullets.

The same cannot be said for 357 SIG, and many reloaders have given up on reloading due to some nuances with the 357 SIG round.

First off, the cartridge case is a bottleneck design like modern rifle cartridges. This allows for extremely reliable feeding and case capacity for the 357 SIG load, but it also means that the brass must be lubricated before it is resized and deprimed.

This step is not overly difficult, but it is an added step in the process that many handgun reloaders might not enjoy.

Secondly, the 357 SIG round headspaces off the shoulder of the cartridge. This means that if you don’t set the shoulder height properly with your resizing die, the round might not chamber on your firearm. This can lead to a lot of frustration when you go to the range with a 50-round 357 SIG load box and none of them work in your handgun!

To combat this, it is essential that your purchase a case gauge to ensure that your 357 SIG load will fit properly in your handgun chamber. You can easily pick one of these up at Brownell’s, but it is another step in the process that can be frustrating to newer reloaders.

Lastly, the 357 SIG round is a very high-pressure cartridge like the 40 S&W. As such, the difference between the minimum and maximum powder charge is often 1 grain or less. This can add a level of complexity and unforgeability that a newer reloader might not be comfortable with.

Can you successfully reload the 357 SIG? Absolutely, and I know several reloading buddies who do so. Just be aware of the added complexity of the cartridge and get the tools needed to create your pet 357 SIG load properly and safely.

For ballistic data, please continue reading .357 SIG vs 9mm: The Answer to a Question That Was Never Asked at Ammo.com

5 Likes

Chris is being paid well no doubt,

I like the Sig as that bottle neck is a sexy round :hugs:

They are loud as hell though

5 Likes

No experience with them, but sounds like the sexy bottle neck might be a PITA for reloading.

In general it seems you get the 9 bullets and the the 40’s issues. I like the 40, and I like the 180 and 200 grain HPs.

What I like most about a 9 is, it is faster for me to get back on target. Being honest I am more accurate with it over a full mag of Mozambiques.

4 Likes

I’ve heard cops say that the 357 SIG’s loud report and bright muzzle flash are good because they alone might be enough to stop a perp dead in his tracks. A “deer in the headlights” effect, so to speak. And like you say, nothing’s so sexy as a bottleneck.

5 Likes

Good article.

No experience with it, but I heard rumors years ago that bullets needed critical “bullet pull” to stay put in the cases. That meant the brass had to be just so for proper neck tension. But again, no experience, just scuttlebutt.

Too, as already alluded to the blast and flash is something to be dealt with. There is a very good reason the .45 ACP is considered by many to be the pinnacle of what a SD cartridge should be. It’s low pressure (low blast) and low flash. The 9mm is a bit worse esp’ if used at night, and even more just adds to the problem. More would refer to the .357 SIG or any bottleneck or high pressure cartridge. That’s the reason my EDC is either a 9mm or .45 ACP, and my HD gun wears a can. Want to find out about follow up shots? Attend a USPSA or IDPA match and see what people there use where follow up shots are normal. I doubt very much that you’ll find anyone shooting a .357 SIG.

Having written all of that, a decade ago the Maine DF&G favored the .357 SIG but I have no idea if they do today.

What makes the ideal SD or HD cartridge? Here’s what it should have, and it’s an impossible set of characteristics, so we have to make tradeoffs.

low recoil
high terminal energy/ballistics AKA stopping power
low blast
quiet
low flash
lots of ammo capacity
low cost for the ability to practice

How many did I forget? Yeah, no such cartridge exists. But we can trade characteristics off to get close. Stopping power? Until one gets above 2000 fps where hydrostatic shock begins it doesn’t exist.

3 Likes