You all know how I feel about these. This one seems to sound the most legitimate out of all I have posted. Even though there is absolutely no details… crazy how that sounds the most legitimate right?
Supposedly there was a tip but what evidence is provided of intent other than the OWNERSHIP OF GUNS.
If there is one it’s not mentioned. They take the other persons word over his just because of what he owns. Is this all that is needed for the stripping of rights?