Federal Gun Control in America: A Historic Guide to Major Federal Gun Control Laws and Acts

For Americans, the crux of gun control laws has been how to disarm dangerous individuals without disarming the public at large. Ever-present in this quest is the question of how the perception of danger should impact guaranteed freedoms protected within the Bill of Rights.

Not only is such a balancing act difficult as-is, but there are also two additional factors that make it even more challenging: America’s federal government is constitutionally bound by the Second Amendment, and politicians notoriously take advantage of tragedies to pass irrational laws when emotions are at their highest. As President Obama’s former Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, once famously remarked:

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

This line of thought is not new to American politics. From the emancipation of enslaved Americans and the organized crime wave of the 1930s to the assassinations of prominent leaders in the 1960s and the attempted assassination of President Reagan in the 1980s, fear has proved a powerful catalyst for appeals about gun control.

Below is an overview of the history behind major gun control laws in the federal government, capturing how we’ve gone from the Founding Fathers’ America of the New World to the United States of the 21st century.

Second Amendment in America’s Bill of Rights: Ratified December 15, 1791

Congress added the Bill of Rights to the Constitution of the United States specifically “to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers.” The Second Amendment is the foundational cornerstone of every American’s right to bear arms, stating:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The right to bear arms was second only to the first – the most vital freedoms of religion, speech, the press, the right to assemble and the right to petition government for redress of grievances. Meanwhile, conflicting views have left government and personal interest groups struggling to reconcile technological advances, isolated but significant violent anomalies and the constitutional mandate protecting the natural right to self defense and this most basic aspect of the Bill of Rights.

First and Second Militia Acts of 1792: Passed May 2 and 8, 1792

The U.S. Congress passed the Militia Acts of 1792 less than a year after the Second Amendment’s ratification. The first act’s purpose was “to provide for the National Defence, by establishing an Uniform Militia throughout the United States.” This measure established the need and command structure for a state-based militia. The second act defined conscription parameters for those militias, limiting armed service to “each and every free able-bodied white male citizen” 18 to 45.

Colonial Gun Regulations

Even today, the majority of firearms laws are state-based and vary considerably. While California, Connecticut and New Jersey have the most restrictive laws, Arizona, Vermont and Kentucky have some of the least stringent. For more than a century, the young United States relied primarily on “state” laws:

  • The earliest came from Virginia, the result of fear of attack by Native Americans. The 1619 law imposed a three-shilling fine on able-bodied men who failed to come armed to church on the Sabbath.
  • By 1640, slave codes in Virginia prohibited all “free Mulattos and Negroes” from bearing arms. In 1712, South Carolina enacted a similar law.
  • During this time in Virginia, gun laws for Native Americans were similar to those for white men – as they were not barred from possessing guns (unless they were gathering food on land held by white men). There were, however, prohibitions against providing “Indians” with weapons and ammunition. Native Americans could own weapons, but there were strict regulations on how they could obtain them.
  • Throughout the Antebellum South, Louisiana, Florida, Maryland, Georgia, North Carolina, Mississippi and even Delaware all passed multiple measures denying guns to people of color, requiring court-issued permits, and allowing search and seizure of weapons as well as punishment without trial.

Militia Act of 1862: Passed July 17, 1862

Often overlooked, the Militia Act of 1862 was highly significant because for the first time, a U.S. government in wartime need called upon “persons of African descent” for military or naval service. Granted, the soldiers were paid less than their white compatriots and were at first primarily laborers. However, the act guaranteed freedom for soldiers and their families in exchange for service. By late October, black Union regiments raised from Kansas, Louisiana and the South Carolina Sea Islands were in the field. President Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, and in May of that year, the War Department established the Bureau of Colored Troops, which would represent nearly 185,000 soldiers during the Civil War.

Fourteenth Amendment: Ratified July 9, 1868

Even as 1863’s Emancipation Proclamation freed all slaves within the United States, racially biased gun control continued through Black Codes in states like Mississippi, Louisiana and Alabama. Internationally, the Paris Anti-Slavery Conference of 1867 condemned the practices, highlighting that in “the States,” even “freedmen” were “forbidden to own or bear fire-arms, and thus were rendered defenceless against assault.” Congress abolished this discriminatory gun control with the most controversial of the three Reconstruction Amendments. While the Thirteenth abolished slavery and the 15th forbade racial discrimination in elections, the Fourteenth Amendment provided “to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Finally, the Fourteenth guaranteed all Americans, regardless of color or appearance, their Second Amendment right to bear arms.

National Rifle Association: Founded November 17, 1871

Originally founded to improve the marksmanship and firearms skills found lacking in troops during the Civil War, the National Rifle Association (NRA) sought to “promote and encourage rifle shooting on a scientific basis." Since then, it has become a complex organization, with its own Legislative Affairs Division, Institute for Legislative Action, Political Victory Fund and NRA Foundation as well as numerous publications.

As “America’s longest-standing civil rights organization,” the NRA is a “diligent [protector] of the Second Amendment.” It actively supported the National Firearms Act of 1934 and Federal Firearms Act of 1938, supported portions of the Gun Control Act of 1968 and was instrumental to the Firearms Owners Protection Act. It opposed renewal of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and backed 2005’s Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act and 2006’s Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act, which became part of 2007’s Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act. In 2013, it opposed expansion of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. The NRA has also been an active protector of the Second Amendment in numerous legal cases involving gun owners’ rights, including 2010’s landmark Supreme Court case McDonald v. Chicago.

National Firearms Act of 1934: Signed Into Law June 26, 1934

Signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the National Firearms Act, Public Law 73-474, sought to control specifically the types of weapons typically involved in organized crime and violent gangland incidents: automatic weapons like machine guns and easily concealed but wide-impact, short-barrel firearms, such as sawed-off shotguns, as well as mufflers and silencers. Rather than banning them, the act instead placed a financial premium on them and allowed tracking of them by requiring that:

  • Importers, manufacturers and dealers register and pay an annual tax: $500 for importers and manufacturers, $300 for pawnbrokers and $200 for dealers.
  • Transferors pay a $200 tax per transaction.
  • Intended recipients complete an application and submit identification, including fingerprints and a photograph.
  • Importers, manufacturers and dealers maintain records of all transactions.
  • All transfers as well as all previously owned firearms be registered, including the firearm’s identifying marks; the owner’s name, address and place of employment; and where the gun was to be kept.
  • Any violation of the act be subject to a $2,000 fine and up to five years in prison.

The National Firearms Act has not been updated since, and importers, manufacturers, dealers and buyers still pay the same fees. Accounting for inflation, the $200 transaction tax would now be the equivalent of more than $3,500, and the $2,000 fine would be more than $35,000.

Federal Firearms Act of 1938: Signed Into Law June 30, 1938

The 1930s were tumultuous years. FDR’s New Deal was rebuilding a struggling America in the face of a well-armed wave of organized crime. John Dillinger was one of the most infamous criminals of the era who used not only machine guns, but other assorted weapons on a crime spree that spanned eight states. Between 1933 and 1934, John Dillinger and his so-called Terror Gang robbed a dozen banks, stole more than $500,000, nearly $9 million in 2016 dollars, killed 11 people and managed to escape from prison on three separate occasions. The crime spree finally ended on June 30, 1934, when federal agents tracked Dillinger to a movie theater in Chicago. Dillinger drew his Colt .380 in an attempt to escape and was cut down by a hail of gunfire from law enforcement. On the fourth anniversary of Dillinger’s death, Congress passed Public Law 75-785, the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, which expanded recordkeeping and accountability for all firearms importers, manufacturers and dealers and placed restrictions on gun ownership. It expressly aimed to regulate interstate and foreign commerce in arms and encompassed not only the guns themselves, but also any silencers or mufflers, ammunition, cartridge cases, bullets and propellant powder. It stated that:

  • Only dealers or manufacturers possessing a license could transport, ship or receive firearms or ammunition in interstate or foreign commerce. The license was $25 per manufacturer and $1 for dealers.
  • Dealers and manufacturers could not ship or transport firearms to anyone under indictment, convicted of a crime or considered a fugitive from justice.
  • Trade in stolen firearms or guns that have had the manufacturer’s serial numbers removed was illegal.

Continue reading Federal Gun Control in America: A Historic Guide to Major Federal Gun Control Laws and Acts on The Resistance Library at Ammo.com.

8 Likes

Way back in last year, round about the time that the VA issue was coming up I said the following, to which by the way I was told on this forum and another forum I was basically full of BS:

The issue is not whether they could have done something before. The point is what can WE do now. Because if we think because we are not in Virginia that we are not affected by this, WE ARE WRONG! What they do in Virginia and what the Virginians do in response is a roadmap of what WIL happen here and in Texas, and in Missouri, and in Alabama, and in Georgia and in etc etc. We can either sit here and armchair quarterback the situation or resolve ourselves to act in support of these folks. If all we can do is say “they should have done this” or “they should have done that” then we have nobody to blame but ourselves when the DSA/dnc gun grabbing Gestapo comes knocking on our own doors. It is the time to speak out and take a stand.

DSA/dnc IS the enemy. Want proof, just look at California.

They were cannon fodder for those life loving Commiecrats. What a bunch of piss ant cowards they are! So much for the public safety Ralph Mengele Northam!!! You are a coward and I hate you and your ilk with the passion of a Constitutionalist that is watching a lying bunch of cowards try to steal his home, his. money, his very freedoms, because I am. And that is exactly what you and your DSA/dnc ilk are trying to do. You are an abortion that forgot to die you bottom feeding scum!

DSA/dnc IS the greatest enemy on earth of the USA. Want proof, just turn your TV on.

So everybody who said “well let’s just peaceably show our unhappiness with this Virginia thing”. I have two words for you and they ain’t merry Christmas! Remember this freak show IS coming to a neighborhood near you. Will your rights survive?

DSA/dnc IS the greatest enemy in the world, of the USA. Want proof, just turn your TV on.

I believed I was right then and I know I am right now. If you are not prepared for these communists to come take your stuff I would strongly suggest you prepare physically. spiritually, and emotionally for what you will have to do in the not so distant future. We are looking at what the " Well let’s see what happens " attitude resulted in. I think it is time for us to face the harsh reality that they WILL be coming and it is not in some distant future time.
And the three hundred said MOLON LABE
III

The enemies of freedom have landed and they are here.

4 Likes

The enemies of this country are playing the long game. The select few who value liberty will eventually die out, and those that will remain will be so desparate to clasp on to the little bit of comfort allotted to them that they’ll be too petrified to revolt. Indoctrinated and afraid and docile, and too atomized to imagine anyone shares their grievances – that’s the American of the future.

3 Likes

So the question is do we just accept this as our final destiny or do we dig our heels in and stay for the long fight? Because each of these choices carries with it consequences for the duration of our time on this planet. I will not go quietly into the night for their version of re-education and indoctrination. I will not willingly give up my means to resist this evil and I will do everything I can to make sure that the posterity of this nation has the chance to know what it is to be a free person.
And the three hundred said MOLON LABE
III

The enemies of freedom have landed, and they are here!

3 Likes

You assume they want to know, does it appear any are fighting to you?

1 Like

Not for me to say. I doubt seriously if the Founders knew whether or not people that followed after them would want it or not, but they gave all for those who would. Should we then snub our heritage and do any less to maintain it?
And the three hundred said MOLON LABE
III

The sociocommunist enemies of freedom have landed, and they are here!

1 Like

I am asking you, do you see anyone fighting back on this takeover?

All I see are the same old media spun lawyers and politicians I do not see anything from the people, many can not even wipe their ass and yet, no push back

As I see it, the defeat has already occurred where it matters :heart: :brain:

1 Like

Some, not all.
Remember III

2 Likes

Robert, just because everybody else says it’s OK to kill babies does not mean I have to agree. Whether I stand alone, with a thousand, with a million, I stand on the fact that there are immutable rights and immutable wrongs. I choose to stand for the immutable rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Your choice is up to you.
And the three hundred said MOLON LABE
III

The sociocommunist enemies of freedom have landed, and they are here!

4 Likes

The evidence of what is openly apparent. We must all make a choice of where we stand and for what we will fight.

3 Likes

@preachp

Thanks for the video.

Well, you know what Biden says…“don’t let the facts get in the way of the truth.” Hmmm, where i come from, you can’t have truth without facts. I guess democrats don’t care about the facts, as long as they have a good story which they can believe in as “the truth.”

3 Likes