I did leave my first name, as for the rest of it, what can I say I have that tin foil hat for a reason. I mask all my online activity and change my locations daily, who knows tomorrow my IP might be in Germany
Iām one who bought something legal at the time and registration prices me out of the game . Should the new idea become a rule I remove a piece of plastic and it becomes legal again. That is in my opinion why it is a stupid rule.
If I had read your John Hancock part earlier I would have put my full name as it inspired me.
Some of us will have to pay a tax or sell something back to people who never owned it in the first place or become felons, the way I read it. I could be wrong, they write their rules so it can be interpreted any way they want, but a bunch of lawyers that nobody elected and it seems nobody can fire.
You seem to have glossed over the fact I took not only the time to leave a comment but also put in the time to discover they are not accepting comments
the term āCommentā is used in place of the more technically accurate term āPublic Submissionā
I didnāt attack your efforts, I checked the link you offered, then the ATFās website, then the guide on comments all in an effort to help as you requested,
So lets examine, you try and help people in your manner, I try in mine, and you offer
ad hominem , nothing about what I posted
and hypocrisy , I was smacked for what I do take seriously, words, etymology, linguistics, and if those are not traits of a hard patriot then please separate me from that classification
butā¦
Think on whats missing from the ATFās proposal , @Equin hit on some of it very well, then with everything that is missing think why the explicit technically accurate term āPublic Submissionā was added.
You have to be careful when responding to these types of situations. Being vulgar doesnāt helpā¦ though being articulate and comprehensive can create a realizationā¦ because there decisions can effect the authors as well.
Three hots and a cot.
After re-reading it, I now realize this is proposed āguidance,ā and not a rule or regulation to be codified in the Code of Federal Regulations. I guess thatās why I was initially confused. My fault for not reading it as carefully as I should have.
Even so, I still find their proposed guidance confusing. And it sounds like it may have the same force of law as a codified regulation, especially if āpossessorsā of a pistol brace fall under their āobjectiveā factors in the guidance.
With that said, Iām still trying to better understand their proposal and pistol braces in general so that I can provide some meaningful comment for them to hopefully consider. The deadline is January 4 I believe.
Alright, I gave it the best thought I could and left my comment. Itāll be interesting to see what transpires out of all this.
One would think "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED " is all the words needed to be said. But that would require government agencies to honor & uphold the constitution.
Yeah, but the first phrase, āA well-regulatedā¦,ā tends to confuse. Iāve heard arguments interpreting it to allow for a regulated right of arms (donāt understand what that means), or that the right shall not be infringed from only those people belonging to a well regulated militia (i.e., State National Guard unit). I donāt agree with those interpretations, though.
Thereās also Supreme Court opinions that have said not all rights are absolute. For instance, yelling āFire!ā in a crowded theater isnāt protected speech, nor is libel or defamation. I suppose with respect to the 2nd Amendment, a felonās right to arms can be infringed, at least while heās serving his sentence and parole. Iām no Constitutional scholar, though.
what Constitution? They have been shredding tat for years
Article 16 from our Maine State Constitution makes it much more clear
Section 16. To keep and bear arms. Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned.
Uncle Tony 101.
Good for you!
Okay, so we all agree our 2a right shouldnāt be infringed upon, BUT why are we all WEARING those GD Masks, Reallyā¦Bumbling Bozo Boob Biden is claiming that the āGun Crisisā is a Health issueā¦never let a crisis go to wasteā¦
Part 2 is that we should all be Bombarding our Congressional Idiots either R or D with your complaints by any meansā¦visit their offices, if you can and educate themā¦
they left out Arms of any kind that a resident may wish to ownā¦so they can restrict what Arms and partsā¦
We?
arms is arms
I wear one in the grocery store, not because they say i should. i donāt give a rats ass what the government tells me to do. i do it on my own free will cause i donāt want that shit again. and if you get it bad as i had it you would too.