I often hear people (even shooting professionals such as Jerry Miculek) say that such n’ such caliber is an extremely accurate cartridge. When I hear anyone make such a blanket statement I think they have a gun in that caliber that they can shoot accurately.
Are certain calibers inherently more accurate than others or is it just the gun and barrel that determine accuracy?
You never hear anyone say such n’ such cartridge is inherently not very accurate.
The 22LR is a design that was outdated 150 years ago. That’s how long ago it’s been since heeled bullets were considered a good design. The first metallic cartridges were heeled bullets. The Russian government told Smith & Wesson “we like your model 3 revolver but don’t like the heeled bullet it shoots”. I hate to admit it but the Russians are the ones that told the Americans to get rid of the heeled bullets. Since then heeled bullets went away everywhere except for the 22LR. Most 22LR guns are very accurate even with the heeled bullets.
I can’t shoot worth a crap with my Schofield. It’s my least accurate gun. And my Ruger Vaquero isn’t much better. Both are chambered in 45 Colt.
When I switch to my S&W Model 29 chambered in .44 Mag and it’s bullseye after bullseye.
Now I’m wondering if some cartridges are more accurate than others.
I have 3 revolvers chambered in 38 Special and they’re all tack drivers.
Even my snubby
Are some cartridges more accurate than other?
Now I’m sure someone will post that they can shoot the hind leg off a gnat at 50 yards with their 45 colt. Yea but is it an uphill battle when a manufacturer tries to make an accurate gun out of a bad cartridge?