Military Handguns - Which Would You Prefer?


#1


#2

being a more than 8 rounds old school (BHP) I am leaning towards the M9


#3

I’ve never shot a Sig, but I regret selling my 92FS. It was easy to field strip and clean, never jammed or malfunctioned, and very accurate.


#4

The beretta with some threads is on my 2019 list of needs


#5

I had to turn in many units 1911s for those 9mm crap. Tho I own a Sig 45, which is the best handgun Ive ever shot. They dont use the P220, only the cops, so I have to stay with the 1911.


#6

Beretta 92FS is one of my all time favorite pistols. I have more than one now… the ones I carry all have been converted to the G model.
Sure they have some down falls, but I can shoot them. Great to suppress too.
While I love Sig… and own quite a few of them, I do not like the 320
I only own one 1911…


#7

Give me that M17. M9 is a big clunky boat anchor that hates it’s own locking block. I absolutely love my P320.


#8

M9A3 with the G-kit. If we have more options than my answer would be different.


#9

If only between those two? The M9. The 1911 gets my vote if we opened up the options.


#10

Glocks are clunky,
M9s are huge and clumsy.
I vote for the 1911.
If the troops had been taught how to properly use them, they’d never been replaced.


#11

Perhaps if the designers had smaller hands or did not seem to add much more ammo capacity, it may have been a more universal application. Same guys were doing pretty well with Brigadier/Helwan as more easily used. I will not disparage Beretta, they have made elegant firearms in all areas of use. My opinion is for the 1911 basic design that has over a 100 years of a success rate that I have difficulty ignoring. They also are especially able for varying personal modifications. Just a thought.


#12

I would take that 92S over the new Sig.


#13

Now I can agree with that.
image